Build and verify a product change
An engineering loop connects a product requirement to implementation, direct verification and the next correction. Egbe’s Product Build capability provides this approach for a first release, an improvement or a bounded repair. Start with the behavior the customer should experience and the evidence that would show it works.
The Business Loop can help decide which change deserves attention. Engineering then makes the agreed result real. Customer and business effects return to the next business decision when there is enough evidence to assess them.
Define a complete result
Section titled “Define a complete result”Describe the useful outcome, who can access it, what persists and how someone continues later. Existing requirements and designs provide the context. A narrow repair can stay in its current task record.
Fix the report continuation problem in our existing app. A customer should be able to save a draft, sign in and reopen that same draft later. Preserve existing saved work and the current sign-in method. Explain the implementation and verification plan before changing behavior outside this scope.
The expected plan connects the initiating action, the component producing the result, authoritative stored state, customer access and recovery. It should identify real dependencies, relevant failure cases and any unresolved product decision.
For a first product, choose a narrow but complete useful result. Add accounts, payments or AI features when that result needs them. The accounts and payments guide explains the capabilities supporting those choices.
Implement through real boundaries
Section titled “Implement through real boundaries”Your agent should inspect the existing application and use its sound patterns. Work can be split into independently useful outcomes, ordered by actual dependencies. A saved result may need durable storage; a purchase may need both payment confirmation and delivery of the purchased right.
Retries, interruptions and identity changes deserve attention wherever they could lose work, duplicate an action or grant access to the wrong person. Appropriate checks follow the particular product and its risks.
Verify the customer’s journey
Section titled “Verify the customer’s journey”Ask for evidence matched to the claim. Local tests can establish local behavior. A published journey needs checks against the revision actually serving customers. Generated or transformed content also needs inspection against the accepted quality criteria.
For the draft example, useful evidence includes reopening the original work, retaining it through sign-in and verifying the accepted access policy. A newly created draft alone would leave preservation of existing work untested.
The handoff should distinguish implemented behavior, verified behavior, remaining checks and customer impact still to be observed. If publishing is authorized, the agent should deploy the intended saved revision and verify the serving result. See Hosting and data for that foundation.
Keep the plan and evidence with the work so another session can resume a failed check or complete an external dependency without reconstructing the project.